You can configure custom benchmark settings in the Advanced Edition, as well as install tests individually and save results offline, to name a few of the perks. You get access to several feature tests, too:
The paid version also unlocks several other benchmarks that are inaccessible in the Basic Edition (free), including Port Royal, which is a real-time ray tracing benchmark, along with Wild Life and Wild Life Extreme, Fire Strike Extreme and Fire Strike Ultra, and a stress test. If only it was that simple.There are other perks, though, like gaining access to Time Spy Extreme, a 4K version of the DirectX 12 benchmark. Most people think a 100 percent load on one program is exactly the same load as 100 percent load on another. They'll get confused why it works for everything else they play or use, failing to understand that each application or game has varying degrees of hardware usage. I honestly believe it to be the best, since it isn't over the top intensive, yet better than any benchmark or game.Ī rather common problem I've had throughout the years of helping clients has involved instability through a poorly tested overclock. It is a good middle ground and great for stability testing. I also wouldn't really call Aida64 a torture test.
But for absolute stability, gaming loads are not a good measurement. Originalmente postado por Monk:I tend to run the same overclocks as the permanent settings, with the one exception being the 5GHz on my 7900x as that gets a bit excessively warm even with a custom loop, so they do a good job for stability testing also, the various tests put a lot of heat into the system and will load them upto 100%, it just isn't a torture test, but more than enough to get stability.įor most gaming loads, sure.
0 kommentar(er)
